Action registry
Bind authority to a specific action
Link a registered business action to its tool. Define the facts and rules that govern that action, within an authenticated project and environment.
A clear execution boundary, owned by your team.ART / Enterprise governance
Intelligence can propose.
Authority stays with you.
You choose which actions require governance. ART enforces your configured rules before those actions execute—with verified evidence, human approval when required, and a fresh check when work resumes.
From intent to authorized execution
A policy is only useful
where it can be enforced.
Access controls define who can use a system. Content safeguards address what a model says. ART’s execution governance addresses the specific action a governed tool is about to perform—and the conditions under which it may proceed.
Register the actionResolve the evidenceEvaluate the policyReview when requiredRevalidate and execute
Choose the boundary
Different actions.
The right level of control.
Governance is your choice. Enforcement follows your configuration.
Action governance configured
Example configuration · Selecting an action changes this illustration only.Evidence → policy → approval
Propose a new delivery date for a supplier order. Check verified order facts. Request a reviewer when your rule requires one, then revalidate before executing.
Interactive policy illustration · Synthetic order data
Same proposed action. Different evidence. Different decision.
Proposed action
Update supplier delivery date
Order value: ₹80,000 · Evidence available
DecisionAsk a person
Verified order value exceeds the example threshold. The configured policy requires a procurement reviewer.
Execution pauses. After approval, facts and the bound action are checked again.
Illustrative rules, not a live policy evaluation. No business action is executed.Six connected controls
Go deeper than
an approval checkbox.
Define the authority a workflow needs, preserve the evidence behind each decision, and keep the authorization attached to the action it was issued for.
Verified policy evidence
Know where the facts came from
Map proposed inputs, authenticated context, and verified lookup results separately. Validate required values and types before the policy decision.
A proposed value is distinguishable from verified evidence.Deterministic evaluation
Turn business rules into decisions
Evaluate explicit conditions, priorities, and nested rule groups. Allow, block, warn, or request human approval, with a configured no-match outcome.
Policy decisions come from configured rules.Revalidation after approval
Keep approval tied to what was reviewed
Refresh policy evidence after approval. If the bound action, arguments, facts, resources, credentials, or policy change, invalidate the approval and require a new review.
Approval for one action does not authorize a changed action.Execution safeguards
Protect the last step into your systems
For supported protected-change tools, bind the checked record identity and provider-enforced version precondition to the write. Use provider-supported idempotency where declared.
Record safeguards are enforced by compatible provider endpoints.Decision evidence
Keep a reason behind the outcome
Review policy reasons, fact origins, resource evidence, policy snapshots, approval metadata, and decision events. Preview policies without issuing an executable authorization.
Explain what was checked, decided, and approved.Authority across time
A review can take time.
The world keeps changing.
A supplier record may change while a person reviews an action. ART refreshes policy facts after approval and compares the bound execution context. A changed record or policy invalidates the earlier approval.
At review
Evidence and action bound together
The decision captures the action, tool, arguments, workspace, facts, resources, and policy context.
Before resuming
Refresh. Compare. Revalidate.
The approval must still match. Expired authorization, changed evidence, or a blocking policy stops the protected action.
At the provider
Enforce supported record safeguards
Compatible protected-change tools send the checked identity and version precondition to the mutation endpoint itself.
Choose safeguards to fit the action. Compatible provider endpoints enforce record-version checks and supported idempotency; broader operations use their configured policy and approval controls.
Enterprise ownership
One execution model.
Clear responsibilities.
Bring business policy, platform implementation, and operational review into the same conversation.
Define the action and decision boundaries.
Name the business action, required evidence, approval thresholds, and the people responsible for exceptions.
Make the boundary executable.
Bind tools and fact sources, configure rules, and verify the provider contracts required for protected writes.
Review the evidence behind the decision.
Inspect policy decisions, approval history, and changes. Use that evidence to support your internal review processes.
Apply it to consequential workflows
Keep the decision
with the right owner.
Start with a specific business action and the evidence required to authorize it. Expand the governed scope as your team validates the workflow.
Procurement
Check order data and route a delivery or commitment change to the responsible reviewer.
Explore supplier reviews ↗Finance operations
Define verified thresholds and approval requirements before a protected operational update.
Explore finance use cases ↗Healthcare operations
Keep administrative changes within scoped access, defined evidence requirements, and authorized human review.
Explore healthcare operations ↗Know the scope
Questions worth asking.
Can we choose which actions to govern?
Yes. Governance is optional and configured per action. Apply it where your process needs policy checks or human authority. Other tools continue under their normal access controls. Once an action is governed, its configured policy is enforced before execution.
Is a human approval enough to execute?
The protected action is revalidated after approval. Updated facts, resources, permissions, credentials, or policies can invalidate the prior decision. The action also needs a valid execution authorization.
Can teams inspect a decision before running an action?
Policy preview explains the decision using the configured facts and rules. It may perform configured read-only lookups; it does not issue an executable decision token for the protected action.
Does this replace enterprise compliance work?
ART provides configurable execution controls and decision evidence. Your organization defines the policy, configures the integrations, and validates the deployment against its requirements.
Bring your policy into the workflow
What must be true
before your agent acts?
Bring one consequential action, its source systems, and your approval requirements. We’ll map the controls with your team.