Agent responsibility
Organize the evidence
Retrieve related evidence, flag missing records, and prepare a structured summary for the quality team.
Review evidence pack
Manufacturing / Production & quality / Solution blueprint
Quality review evidence packs
Bring the evidence behind a quality exception into one review.
Business problem & expected outcomes
The challenge behind
quality review evidence packs.
Inspection notes, batch references, and corrective-action records are scattered. Quality reviewers need traceable source material to assess the exception.
What this workflow is designed to deliver
Review evidence pack
Retrieve related evidence, flag missing records, and prepare a structured summary for the quality team.
How to measure the improvementEvidence traceability; preparation time; release actions prevented without an authorized decision.
Start with the right information.
Inspection reports, batch identifiers, quality procedures, and corrective-action notes.
Interactive workflow diagram
From quality records
to a clear next step.
Retrieve related evidence, flag missing records, and prepare a structured summary for the quality team.
ManufacturingSelect a stage to explore
Context
Quality records
Inspection reports, batch identifiers, quality procedures, and corrective-action notes.
Prepared outputReview evidence pack
Designed around the work
A focused agent. The right capabilities.
Give the agent the context and tools this process needs, with an explicit output and an accountable owner.
Connected tools & context
Bind only the operations this workflow needs. Keep credentials in ART and choose the permitted tools explicitly.
File storage
Project & environment scopeStore inspection files and relate batch records, exceptions, and corrective actions using dynamic tables.
Dynamic tables
Project & environment scopeStore inspection files and relate batch records, exceptions, and corrective actions using dynamic tables.
The decision boundary
Qualified quality staff decide disposition and release. An agent cannot independently release a batch or certify compliance.
ART product mapping
Components used.
Chosen for this case.
Agent Lab prepares the work described below. These are the capabilities that support this workflow.
Datalake
File storage
Keep the supporting files accessible within the review’s project and environment.
Datalake
Dynamic tables
Track the case, owner, source references, and review state as structured records.
Agent Lab
Human approvals
Pause the proposed action for the designated owner to review its evidence.
The implementation, step by step
From source context
to a reviewed result.
- 01
Quality records
Inspection reports, batch identifiers, quality procedures, and corrective-action notes.
Agree the trigger or manual request, record identifiers, and the process owner. - 02
Organize the evidence
Retrieve related evidence, flag missing records, and prepare a structured summary for the quality team.
Define instructions, permitted tools, and the expected output. Keep missing information explicit. - 03
Quality-owner review
Qualified quality staff decide disposition and release. An agent cannot independently release a batch or certify compliance.
Configure the selected policy or approval capabilities before enabling write actions. - 04
Review evidence pack
Evidence traceability; preparation time; release actions prevented without an authorized decision.
Compare outputs with reviewed examples and test incomplete, conflicting, and unauthorized inputs.
Before you build
What this implementation needs.
File storage
A document inventory, resource access scopes, and a file-retention policy.
Dynamic tables
Typed fields, record identifiers, relationships, and a table-retention policy.
Human approvals
Named reviewer roles, escalation ownership, and timeout and rejection behavior.
Also prepare an ART project and environment, the model configuration appropriate to your agent, an accountable process owner, and approved sample data.
Authority stays with your team
Define the boundary
before enabling the action.
Qualified quality staff decide disposition and release. An agent cannot independently release a batch or certify compliance.
Explore execution governanceConnect deliberately.
Map the source material and responsible owners first. Where the selected components require system access, configure scoped APIs or tools. A document-based pilot can start with approved material already available in the workspace.
Make each handoff inspectable.
Keep source references with the prepared output and review representative results before expanding scope. If the implementation includes executable actions, define their required facts and authority first. Apply retention to any stored records, files, or memory used by the case.
Build evidence from your own work
Start small.
Agree what good looks like.
What to measure for this case
Evidence traceability; preparation time; release actions prevented without an authorized decision.
Establish a baseline
Choose a bounded sample of completed cases, record the current process, and agree review criteria with the process owner.
Run in review mode
Use approved sample data and read-only connections. Compare prepared outputs with reviewer expectations, including incomplete and conflicting inputs.
Expand with approval
Enable a limited set of actions only after the team accepts the results. Check approvals, failures, and handoffs before increasing scope.
Make it your workflow
Try this approach
in Agent Lab.
Start with quality records. Connect your approved tools, configure the review boundary, and adapt the output to your team's process.
Try Workflow in Agent Lab
Open your ART workspace to configure this use case.
Discuss the setup with usIndustry & department library
Find your next use case.
3 use cases in Manufacturing
ManufacturingWorkflow design
- ContextProduction exception
- Agent LabAssemble line context
- Your teamSupervisor review
Prepared outputException handoff
Solution blueprint
Production exception handoffs
Give the line owner a clear picture of an interruption.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Connectors & MCP
- Dynamic tables
- Agent Skills
- Human approvals
ManufacturingWorkflow design
- ContextEquipment question
- Agent LabFind approved procedures
- Your teamTechnician decision
Prepared outputMaintenance guidance
Solution blueprint
Maintenance knowledge retrieval
Bring approved equipment guidance into the technician’s review.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Knowledge Base
- Connectors & MCP
ManufacturingWorkflow design
- ContextShift records
- Agent LabSummarize open work
- Your teamIncoming-shift review
Prepared outputShift continuity brief
Solution blueprint
Shift handover preparation
Carry unresolved production context into the next shift.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Agent memory
- Dynamic tables
- Agent Skills
Manufacturing / Let’s explore the fit
Discuss your
industry use case.
Tell us where work slows down. We’ll discuss how ART could fit your process, your systems, and the decisions your team needs to own.
