Agent responsibility
Track versions & evidence
Collect the submitted material, check the review checklist, and summarize open comments for the coordinator.
Material review register
Education / Content & knowledge / Solution blueprint
Course material review coordination
Give academic reviewers a complete packet for each update.
Business problem & expected outcomes
The challenge behind
course material review coordination.
Materials and reviewer comments are distributed across folders and messages. Coordinators spend time finding the current version.
What this workflow is designed to deliver
Material review register
Collect the submitted material, check the review checklist, and summarize open comments for the coordinator.
How to measure the improvementVersion-reference accuracy; checklist completeness; time spent coordinating reviews.
Start with the right information.
Course files, revision notes, accessibility checklists, and reviewer assignments.
Interactive workflow diagram
From course materials
to a clear next step.
Collect the submitted material, check the review checklist, and summarize open comments for the coordinator.
EducationSelect a stage to explore
Context
Course materials
Course files, revision notes, accessibility checklists, and reviewer assignments.
Prepared outputMaterial review register
Designed around the work
A focused agent. The right capabilities.
Give the agent the context and tools this process needs, with an explicit output and an accountable owner.
Connected tools & context
Bind only the operations this workflow needs. Keep credentials in ART and choose the permitted tools explicitly.
File storage
Project & environment scopeOrganize source files and track version references, reviewer assignments, and review status.
Dynamic tables
Project & environment scopeOrganize source files and track version references, reviewer assignments, and review status.
The decision boundary
Academic staff approve publication and content decisions. The agent prepares and coordinates the review.
ART product mapping
Components used.
Chosen for this case.
Agent Lab prepares the work described below. These are the capabilities that support this workflow.
Datalake
File storage
Keep the supporting files accessible within the review’s project and environment.
Datalake
Dynamic tables
Track the case, owner, source references, and review state as structured records.
Agent Lab
Human approvals
Pause the proposed action for the designated owner to review its evidence.
The implementation, step by step
From source context
to a reviewed result.
- 01
Course materials
Course files, revision notes, accessibility checklists, and reviewer assignments.
Agree the trigger or manual request, record identifiers, and the process owner. - 02
Track versions & evidence
Collect the submitted material, check the review checklist, and summarize open comments for the coordinator.
Define instructions, permitted tools, and the expected output. Keep missing information explicit. - 03
Faculty review
Academic staff approve publication and content decisions. The agent prepares and coordinates the review.
Configure the selected policy or approval capabilities before enabling write actions. - 04
Material review register
Version-reference accuracy; checklist completeness; time spent coordinating reviews.
Compare outputs with reviewed examples and test incomplete, conflicting, and unauthorized inputs.
Before you build
What this implementation needs.
File storage
A document inventory, resource access scopes, and a file-retention policy.
Dynamic tables
Typed fields, record identifiers, relationships, and a table-retention policy.
Human approvals
Named reviewer roles, escalation ownership, and timeout and rejection behavior.
Also prepare an ART project and environment, the model configuration appropriate to your agent, an accountable process owner, and approved sample data.
Authority stays with your team
Define the boundary
before enabling the action.
Academic staff approve publication and content decisions. The agent prepares and coordinates the review.
Explore execution governanceConnect deliberately.
Map the source material and responsible owners first. Where the selected components require system access, configure scoped APIs or tools. A document-based pilot can start with approved material already available in the workspace.
Make each handoff inspectable.
Keep source references with the prepared output and review representative results before expanding scope. If the implementation includes executable actions, define their required facts and authority first. Apply retention to any stored records, files, or memory used by the case.
Build evidence from your own work
Start small.
Agree what good looks like.
What to measure for this case
Version-reference accuracy; checklist completeness; time spent coordinating reviews.
Establish a baseline
Choose a bounded sample of completed cases, record the current process, and agree review criteria with the process owner.
Run in review mode
Use approved sample data and read-only connections. Compare prepared outputs with reviewer expectations, including incomplete and conflicting inputs.
Expand with approval
Enable a limited set of actions only after the team accepts the results. Check approvals, failures, and handoffs before increasing scope.
Make it your workflow
Try this approach
in Agent Lab.
Start with course materials. Connect your approved tools, configure the review boundary, and adapt the output to your team's process.
Try Workflow in Agent Lab
Open your ART workspace to configure this use case.
Discuss the setup with usIndustry & department library
Find your next use case.
3 use cases in Education
EducationWorkflow design
- ContextStudent question
- Agent LabRetrieve approved guidance
- Your teamEscalate exceptions
Prepared outputReferenced answer
Solution blueprint
Student-service enquiries
Prepare helpful responses from the institution’s own published guidance.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Knowledge Base
- Agent Skills
EducationWorkflow design
- ContextCampus request
- Agent LabTrack status & ownership
- Your teamService-team coordination
Prepared outputConnected service record
Solution blueprint
Campus service tracking
Keep service teams connected as campus requests change hands.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Secured channels
- Dynamic tables
- Agent Skills
EducationWorkflow design
- ContextPolicy question
- Agent LabRetrieve published sources
- Your teamCheck source coverage
Prepared outputSource-linked answer
Solution blueprint
Published policy answers
Prepare answers to routine questions from current institutional guidance.
Used in this case
Explore the implementation - Knowledge Base
- Agent Skills
Education / Let’s explore the fit
Discuss your
industry use case.
Tell us where work slows down. We’ll discuss how ART could fit your process, your systems, and the decisions your team needs to own.
