Check source references
Compare submitted content with required fields, flag unsupported claims, and prepare a proposed catalogue update.

Retail & commerce / Content & knowledge / Solution blueprint
Prepare consistent catalogue updates with source evidence attached.
Business problem & expected outcomes
Supplier content arrives in different formats. Missing specifications and unsupported claims can slip into the publishing process.
Compare submitted content with required fields, flag unsupported claims, and prepare a proposed catalogue update.
How to measure the improvementRequired-field coverage; unsupported claims caught in review; reviewer edit effort.
Supplier specification sheets, catalogue fields, brand guidelines, and publishing rules.
Interactive workflow diagram
Compare submitted content with required fields, flag unsupported claims, and prepare a proposed catalogue update.
Supplier specification sheets, catalogue fields, brand guidelines, and publishing rules.
Designed around the work
Give the agent the context and tools this process needs, with an explicit output and an accountable owner.
Compare submitted content with required fields, flag unsupported claims, and prepare a proposed catalogue update.
Bind only the operations this workflow needs. Keep credentials in ART and choose the permitted tools explicitly.
Retrieve approved guidance and attach source references to the prepared answer.
Keep source files and versioned product records, with references between each proposed field and its evidence.
Package the checklist, instructions, and expected output as a reusable skill.
A merchandiser approves changes before a publishing connector writes to the catalogue.
ART product mapping
Agent Lab prepares the work described below. These are the capabilities that support this workflow.
Retrieve approved guidance and attach source references to the prepared answer.
Keep the supporting files accessible within the review’s project and environment.
Package the checklist, instructions, and expected output as a reusable skill.
Pause the proposed action for the designated owner to review its evidence.
The implementation, step by step
Supplier specification sheets, catalogue fields, brand guidelines, and publishing rules.
Agree the trigger or manual request, record identifiers, and the process owner.Compare submitted content with required fields, flag unsupported claims, and prepare a proposed catalogue update.
Define instructions, permitted tools, and the expected output. Keep missing information explicit.A merchandiser approves changes before a publishing connector writes to the catalogue.
Configure the selected policy or approval capabilities before enabling write actions.Required-field coverage; unsupported claims caught in review; reviewer edit effort.
Compare outputs with reviewed examples and test incomplete, conflicting, and unauthorized inputs.Before you build
An approved document set, content owners, and retrieval access boundaries.
A document inventory, resource access scopes, and a file-retention policy.
A process checklist, example inputs, and a reviewer-approved output format.
Named reviewer roles, escalation ownership, and timeout and rejection behavior.
Also prepare an ART project and environment, the model configuration appropriate to your agent, an accountable process owner, and approved sample data.
Authority stays with your team
A merchandiser approves changes before a publishing connector writes to the catalogue.
Explore execution governanceMap the source material and responsible owners first. Where the selected components require system access, configure scoped APIs or tools. A document-based pilot can start with approved material already available in the workspace.
Keep source references with the prepared output and review representative results before expanding scope. If the implementation includes executable actions, define their required facts and authority first. Apply retention to any stored records, files, or memory used by the case.
Build evidence from your own work
Required-field coverage; unsupported claims caught in review; reviewer edit effort.
Choose a bounded sample of completed cases, record the current process, and agree review criteria with the process owner.
Use approved sample data and read-only connections. Compare prepared outputs with reviewer expectations, including incomplete and conflicting inputs.
Enable a limited set of actions only after the team accepts the results. Check approvals, failures, and handoffs before increasing scope.
Make it your workflow
Start with product draft. Connect your approved tools, configure the review boundary, and adapt the output to your team's process.
Open your ART workspace to configure this use case.
Discuss the setup with usIndustry & department library
3 use cases in Retail & commerce
Give support a complete view of an order that needs attention.
Prepare a return review with the supporting records attached.
Help store teams find the current operating procedure.
Retail & commerce / Let’s explore the fit
Tell us where work slows down. We’ll discuss how ART could fit your process, your systems, and the decisions your team needs to own.