Check order & policy
Assemble a case summary, check the required facts, and propose either a policy-aligned response or an escalation.

Customer operations / Customer service / Solution blueprint
Prepare a refund decision with the order history and policy in view.
Business problem & expected outcomes
Support teams move between orders, conversations, and policy documents. Approving a refund without all three can create inconsistent treatment.
Assemble a case summary, check the required facts, and propose either a policy-aligned response or an escalation.
How to measure the improvementEvidence coverage; escalation accuracy; refunds executed only with the required authorization.
Order details, payment references, support history, and the current refund policy.
Interactive workflow diagram
Assemble a case summary, check the required facts, and propose either a policy-aligned response or an escalation.
Order details, payment references, support history, and the current refund policy.
Designed around the work
Give the agent the context and tools this process needs, with an explicit output and an accountable owner.
Assemble a case summary, check the required facts, and propose either a policy-aligned response or an escalation.
Bind only the operations this workflow needs. Keep credentials in ART and choose the permitted tools explicitly.
Read the source records needed for customer refund reviews. Pass record identifiers and retrieved evidence to the agent.
Retrieve approved guidance and attach source references to the prepared answer.
Validate the amount and policy conditions. Require the configured approver before a refund tool executes.
ART product mapping
Agent Lab prepares the work described below. These are the capabilities that support this workflow.
Retrieve the required records through scoped tools; begin with read-only access.
Retrieve approved guidance and attach source references to the prepared answer.
Validate required facts and evaluate explicit rules before an action can proceed.
Pause the proposed action for the designated owner to review its evidence.
The implementation, step by step
Order details, payment references, support history, and the current refund policy.
Agree the trigger or manual request, record identifiers, and the process owner.Assemble a case summary, check the required facts, and propose either a policy-aligned response or an escalation.
Define instructions, permitted tools, and the expected output. Keep missing information explicit.Validate the amount and policy conditions. Require the configured approver before a refund tool executes.
Configure the selected policy or approval capabilities before enabling write actions.Evidence coverage; escalation accuracy; refunds executed only with the required authorization.
Compare outputs with reviewed examples and test incomplete, conflicting, and unauthorized inputs.Before you build
Source-system APIs or MCP tools, scoped credentials, and an integration owner.
An approved document set, content owners, and retrieval access boundaries.
Registered actions, required facts, and explicit allow, block, or approval rules.
Named reviewer roles, escalation ownership, and timeout and rejection behavior.
Also prepare an ART project and environment, the model configuration appropriate to your agent, an accountable process owner, and approved sample data.
Authority stays with your team
Validate the amount and policy conditions. Require the configured approver before a refund tool executes.
Explore execution governanceMap the source material and responsible owners first. Where the selected components require system access, configure scoped APIs or tools. A document-based pilot can start with approved material already available in the workspace.
Keep source references with the prepared output and review representative results before expanding scope. If the implementation includes executable actions, define their required facts and authority first. Apply retention to any stored records, files, or memory used by the case.
Build evidence from your own work
Evidence coverage; escalation accuracy; refunds executed only with the required authorization.
Choose a bounded sample of completed cases, record the current process, and agree review criteria with the process owner.
Use approved sample data and read-only connections. Compare prepared outputs with reviewer expectations, including incomplete and conflicting inputs.
Enable a limited set of actions only after the team accepts the results. Check approvals, failures, and handoffs before increasing scope.
Make it your workflow
Start with refund request. Connect your approved tools, configure the review boundary, and adapt the output to your team's process.
Open your ART workspace to configure this use case.
Discuss the setup with usIndustry & department library
3 use cases in Customer operations
Give the next specialist the context to continue the conversation.
Prepare grounded answers from approved support guidance.
Keep the service team aligned while a complex case is being resolved.
Customer operations / Let’s explore the fit
Tell us where work slows down. We’ll discuss how ART could fit your process, your systems, and the decisions your team needs to own.